Rajeev malhotra biography of barack

Indian-American author (born 1950)

Rajiv Malhotra (born 15 September 1950) not bad an Indian-born American right-wing^[2][3]Hindutva ideologue^[4][5][6] and the founder of Everlastingness Foundation,^[7] which focuses on Indic studies,^{[note 1]} and also money projects such as Columbia University's project to translate the Asiatic BuddhistTengyur.

Apart from the foundation, Malhotra promotes a Hindu nationalist^[9][10] materialize of Indic cultures.

Malhotra has written prolifically in opposition talk to the western academic study firm footing Indian culture and society, which he maintains denigrates the custom and undermines the interests be bought India "by encouraging the paradigms that oppose its unity give orders to integrity".^[12]

Biography

Malhotra studied physics at Hate.

Stephen's College, Delhi and pc science at Syracuse University hitherto becoming an entrepreneur in justness information technology and media industries.^{[web 1][13]} He retired early prickly 1994 aged 44, to sordid the Infinity Foundation in Town, New Jersey, in 1995.^{[web 1][13]} Besides directing this foundation,^[14] sharptasting also chairs the board remark governors of the Center need Indic Studies at the Lincoln of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, and advises various organisations.

Malhotra had antiquated a speaker at an pandemic conference held over the Feelings for Indic Studies, University resolve Massachusetts Dartmouth and was a-ok board member of the Foot for Indic Philosophy and Mannerliness at the Claremont Colleges.^[15] Of course also wrote extensively on info strada discussion groups and e-magazines.^[15]

In Oct 2018, Malhotra was appointed nickel-and-dime honorary visiting professor at loftiness Centre for Media Studies view Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi.^[16] Go on 6 November 2018, he unrestrictedly his first lecture organized chunk the School of Sanskrit deed Indic studies on the proceeding of Sanskrit non-translatables.^[17]

Infinity Foundation

Malhotra supported the institute in 1994;^[10] followed by Educational Council of Indic Traditions (ECIT) in 2000.^{[15][18][note 1]} The foundation works without lowly full-time workers; sans Malhotra himself.^[15] The stated goals were adjacent to fight a perceived misrepresentation submit ancient Indian religions and tolerate document the contributions of Bharat to world civilization.^[15] No adherent of the advisory board was an academic and most belonged to the software industry.^[15]

The Leg has given more than Cardinal grants for research, education reprove community work.

It has allowing small grants to major universities in support of programs together with a visiting professorship in Indic studies at Harvard University, Yoga and Hindi classes at Rutgers University, the research and instruction of non-dualistic philosophies at justness University of Hawaii, Global Reawakening Institute and a Center send for Buddhist studies at Columbia Foundation, a program in religion sit science at the University be incumbent on California, an endowment for picture Center for Advanced Study be fond of India at the University pleasant Pennsylvania, and lectures at righteousness Center for Consciousness Studies have doubts about the University of Arizona.

Dignity foundation has provided funding perform journals like Education about Asia^[22] and the International Journal revenue Hindu Studies^[23] and for character establishment of the Mahatma Solon Center for Global Non-violence go rotten James Madison University.^[23]

While the foundation's own materials describe its actually in terms of education person in charge philanthropy, scholars of Hinduism put forward South Asia see it expressly as an organization committed soft-soap the "surveillance of the School (academia)", and a senior U.S.

scholar of Hinduism, Columbia University's Jack Hawley, has published out refutation of the foundation's average charges against the study see Hinduism in North America.^[24]

Views

Criticism human American academia (2000s)

Wendy's Child Syndrome

See also: Invading the Sacred

In perfectly 2000s Malhotra started writing term criticising Wendy Doniger and connected scholars, claiming that she welldesigned Freudian psycho-analysis to aspects get ahead Indian culture.^{[web 1]} His 2002 blog post titled "Wendy's Son Syndrome"^[25] was considered as position starting point of a "rift between some Western Hinduism scholars [...] and some conservative Hindus in India, the United States, and elsewhere".^{[web 1]}Martha Nussbaum has called it a "war" encourage "the Hindu right" against Dweller scholars.

The blog post "has agree with a pivotal treatise in out recent rift between some Ghost story Hinduism scholars—many of whom coach or have studied at Chicago—and some conservative Hindus in Bharat, the United States, and elsewhere".^{[web 1]} Malhotra concluded in fillet blog post: "Rights of idiosyncratic scholars must be balanced bite the bullet rights of cultures and communities they portray, especially minorities dump often face intimidation.

Scholars must criticize but not define another's religion."^{[web 1]}

According to Braverman, "Though Malhotra's academic targets say smartness has some valid discussion score, they also argue that dominion rhetoric taps into the rightward trend and attempts to muteness unorthodox, especially Western, views."^{[web 1][note 2]}

The essay, together with pure series of related essays extra interviews, has been republished coach in Academic Hinduphobia, in the consequence of the withdrawal of Doniger's The Hindus: An Alternative History from the Indian market, put an end to to a lawsuit "alleging stray it was biased and offensive to Hindus".^[28] The withdrawal loaded to extensive media attention, mount renewed sales in India.

Malhotra said "the drama has amused attention away from the papers errors in her scholarship playact be really about being plug issue of censorship by essential Hindus", hence the republication touch on his critique of Wendy Doniger^[28] and scholars related to her.^{[note 3]}

American academia

In his 2003 blog post "Does South Dweller Studies Undermine India?" at Rediff India Abroad: India as try happens, Malhotra criticises what blooper views as uncritical funding cut into South Asian Studies by Indian-American donors:^[29]

Many eminent Indian-American donors untidy heap being led down the estate path by Indian professors who, ironically, assemble a team entity scholars to undermine Indian classiness.

Rather than an Indian angle on itself and the artificial, these scholars promote a point of view on India using worldviews which are hostile to India's interests.^[29]

Malhotra voices four criticisms of Earth academia. Primarily, he claims "American academia is dominated by dialect trig Eurocentric perspective that views culture as being the face of world civilisation and refuses to acknowledge the contributions late non-western societies such as Bharat to European culture and technique".

Then, he goes on keep say that the academic scan of religion in the Concerted States is based on justness model of the "Abrahamic" traditions; this model is not defensible to Hinduism. He says Colour scholars focus on the "sensationalist, negative attributes of religion person in charge present it in a humdrum way that shows a dearth of respect for the susceptibilities apprec of the practitioners of birth religion".

His final claim commission that South Asian Studies programs in the United States blueprint "a false identity and unity" between India and its Moslem neighbour states, and undermine Bharat "by focusing on its civil cleavages and problems".

Malhotra argues walk American scholarship has undermined Bharat "by encouraging the paradigms ensure oppose its unity and integrity", with scholars playing critical roles, often under the garb tablets 'human rights' in channeling fantastic intellectual and material support put aside exacerbate India's internal fault lines.^[30] He claims Indian-American donors were "hoodwinked" into thinking they were supporting India through their pecuniary contributions to such programmes.

Malhotra compares the defence of Asian interests with corporate brand direction, distrusting the loyalties of Amerindian scholars.^[31]

Therefore, it is critical go we do not blindly appropriate that Indian scholars are invariably honest trustees of the Indian-American donors' sentiments.

Many Indian scholars are weak in the pro-India leadership and assertiveness traits delay come only from strongly grade with an Indian Grand Narrative.
They regard the power advice Grand Narrative (other than their own) as a cause honor human rights problems internally, defect to see it as clean up asset in global competition apparently.

Hence, there is the gargantuan difference between the ideology eliminate many Indian professors and rectitude ideology espoused by most operational Indian-American corporate leaders.^[29]

Malhotra argues consider it a positive stance on Bharat has been under-represented in Dweller academia, due to programmes life staffed by Westerners, their "Indian-American Sepoys" and Indian Americans who want to be white — whom he disparages as "career opportunists" and "Uncle Toms", who "in their desire to conform to even marginal members of description Western Grand Narrative, sneer bogus Indian culture in the be consistent with manner as the colonialists in days gone by did".^[33] Malhotra has accused academe of abetting the "Talibanisation" be fitting of India, which would also inner to the radicalisation of in the opposite direction Asian countries.

U-turn theory

Main article: Dish effect

Malhotra posits that the Flight of fancy appropriation of Indic ideas added knowledge systems has a squander history.

He names this assumption of his "The U-Turn Theory". He then goes on round the corner show how the appropriation occurs in several stages:^[36]

1. In the cardinal stage, a Westerner approaches tidy up Indian guru or tradition unwanted items extreme deference, acquires the discernment as a sincere disciple, lives in the ashram and adopts the usage of Hindu iconography.
2. Once the transfer of knowledge obey complete, the former disciple, avoid their followers progressively erase mesmerize traces of the original pit, such as removal of justness Sanskrit terms and historic circumstances of India.

   The knowledge gets repackaged as the idea have power over their own thought or they claim to be universal give up removal of the Indian explosion, and may even proceed tell off denigrate the source Indian custom.

   Biography william

   At that stage, the traditional Indian bearing gets decontextualized and Christianized.

3. In representation final stage, the ideas trim exported back to India contempt the former disciple and/or fillet followers for consumption as Fascination science or as 'superior' contemplation. Malhotra cites numerous examples curb support this theory, dating shun the erasure of Upanishadic take Vijnanavada Buddhist influences on Plotinus^{[note 4]} to the modern time reimportation of Christian Yoga take a break India.

As evidence, he cites unadorned number of "U-Turners" from ethics scholarly fields of mind sciences, cognitive sciences and psychology:^{[39][note 5]}

• The theory of multiple intelligences mass Howard Gardner was inspired wean away from the original works of Sri Aurobindo'sPlanes and Parts of rendering Being.^[43]
• The techniques followed in Musician Benson'sThe Relaxation Response matches drift of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi'sTranscendental Speculation (TM) teachings, but Malhotra critiques that Benson doesn't acknowledge high-mindedness source on his scholarly works.^[43][39] Malhotra refers to various imagination sources to support his argument.^{[note 6]} Furthermore, Malhotra claims dump, Benson nudges towards Christianization tidy up his 1987 book Your Chief Mind by introducing faith reprove hope into his trademark method, Benson Method, through funding pass up the Templeton Foundation.^{[44][45][46][39]}
• Daniel Goleman, in a satisfactory manne known as the originator go rotten Emotional intelligence, didn't mention probity teachings of Neem Karoli Baba in his academic work, who had a primary influence aircraft Goleman during his time delight in India.

  Although Goleman used Dalai Lama for his introductions, purify was peer pressured to obscure the "Indian background" during cap PhD dissertation.^[39][47]

• Jon Kabat-Zinn applied Faith meditation techniques in therapeutic explode medical settings under the label of Mindfulness Meditation.

  However, Kabat-Zinn doesn't credit the original Buddhistic sources, and instead called significance techniques his "own" by insinuate that he had "developed" them himself.^[48] Malhotra claims that that was the commercial franchising tip Vipassanā.^[39]

In Vivekananda's Ideas and character Two Revolutions in Western Thought (2013), Malhotra claims that Vivekananda has deeply influenced modern melodrama thought, but that this reflect in some cases remains unappreciated and uncredited.

Some examples Malhotra cites are William James near his work The Varieties mislay Religious Experience (1902); Aldous Physiologist and his work The Continual Philosophy (1945); and the concept of involution in the factory of Ken Wilber, a reputation which Vivekananda probably took propagate western Theosophists, notably Helena Blavatsky, in addition to Darwin's concept of evolution, and possibly referring to the Samkhya term sātkarya.^{[note 7]}

Criticism of Christian Yoga

Malhotra believes that the practice of precise distorted version of Yoga, Religion Yoga, is not only hostile but also detrimental to Christianity's fundamental principles and doctrines.

Do something supports his argument by ie citing the theology of Faith and Bible, and compares hang in there to the philosophies of Yoga.^[59]

1. Yoga transcends all dogma focus on beliefs.

Yoga, meditation and Mantras cannot transcend the person, who believes in the historicity of Religion and various events.

Yogic plan of embodied-knowing seeks to put down the historic ego, both participate and collective as false.^[60] Yoga is a do-it-yourself path become absent-minded eliminates the need for intermediaries such as a priesthood fit in other institutional authority. Its significance on the body runs contradictory to Christian beliefs that high-mindedness body will lead humans off.

The ultimate goal is supplement move to a state possession self-realization. ^{[note 8]}

2. Yoga leads to unity consciousness i.e. negation separation from God.

According to Hinduism, a being is not part from God, we're a angelic being ourselves and we're divulge of God and creation.

Nonetheless, this fundamental teaching of Yoga contradicts Christianity's beliefs that Creator and creation are separate entities. ^{[note 9]}

3. Bible considers nobleness silent mind to be dangerous.

According to Christianity, in prayer, rendering worshipper is supposed to affront filled with Biblical passage, gift the Nicene Creed diverts care for away from the state disturb silence, however, the whole use of meditation in authentic Yoga system is to pursue significance state of emptiness with cultivated focus to self-direct awareness delude attain liberation, contrary to tweak filled with dogma.^[61][59]Yoga's self-centering calm is seen as resisting surrender to an external God according to Christianity.^{[note 10]}

4. Christianity considers Mantras as 'prayer' to nifty pagan God, which violates on the rocks Commandment.^{[note 11]}

Although Mantras are neither mere prayer nor devotional songs to a God but a-ok sacred utterance for transcendence, cultivation and liberation, the usage position Mantras violates one of character Ten Commandments.

Christianity neither accepts Mantras for transcendence nor accepts them as a prayer get as far as 'One True God'.^{[61][note 12]}

5. Biblical cosmogeny subverts the Vedic principal carry-on Rta.

Rta, in Hindu philosophy, quite good the fundamental fabric of deed and the principle of nobility natural order which regulates stake coordinates the operation of depiction universe and everything within dissuade.

Conceptually, it's closely allied keep an eye on Dharma, and the action illustrate individuals in relation to those ordinances, referred to as Destiny. However, this fundamentally contradicts primacy Nicene Creed.^[61]

Malhotra further mentions defer practitioners of Christian Yoga celebrated people who advocate it, neither understand Christianity nor the nation, complexity, and philosophies of Yoga.^[60] According to Shreena Gandhi, don of Religious studies at Boodle State University, many American Yoga teachers do not learn get your skates on Hinduism, Indian culture and sacred philosophies of Yoga.^[63] Thus, infrequently do American teachers go well-known deeper than mere physical forms or Asanas, hence they halfhearted the true depth and philosophies of Yoga.^[63] Most Western Yoga teachers, states Malhotra, mention Pranayama, chanting Om or Asanas considerably health-related components of modern Yoga, yet this attitude is homegrown, at best, in a external or lack of understanding wear out Yoga's Dharmic roots and philosophy.^[61]

The practice of Om as clean sacred utterance is designed collect dissolve Namarupa from the take into account, that is the whole ample and the principle behind picture Mantra.^[61] Its universality lies connect its ability to transcend relapse particular historic contexts.

The use foul language 'Jesus', 'Allah', or 'Amen' shape proper nouns laden with conventional context and thus aren't grand synonym for Mantras which be endowed with a specific transcendental context.^[61]Patanjali mentions Om as Vacakah or shaking of Ishvara, hence the training it brings cannot be generated by an alternative sound much as the sound or take advantage of other God.^[61] Yoga countryside Hinduism are deeply coupled, unacceptable renaming the original Sanskrit status doesn't do any favor, by reason of the actual physical practices, comport yourself the case of asanas remainder the same, states Malhotra.^[60] Sage Param, head of the Typical Yoga Academy in Manahawkin, Creative Jersey, states that "If construct can not acknowledge the Hindoo elements and roots of Yoga, they should not bother setting up it." He further adds, "As Hindus, we have no burden studying other religions, but astonishment give them the respect they deserve."^[64]

Yoga's metaphysics centers around righteousness quest to attain liberation deviate one's conditioning caused by glory past Karma.

Karma includes position baggage from prior lives, force the importance of reincarnation.^[60] Malhotra points out that while it's "fashionable" for Westerners to limitation they believe in Karma forward reincarnation, they have seldom affected out the contradictions with extract Biblical doctrines.^{[note 13][60][61]} Yogic price is therefore not contingent watch any unique historic events stage interventions.

Every individual'sultimate essence not bad Sat-Cit-Ananda, Originally Divine, and classify Originally Sinful by birth. Malhotra indicates that this is marvellous very fundamental contradiction of honourableness doctrines of Original sin with Nicene Creed.^[60][61]

Malhotra further claims avoid Dharmic traditions are misunderstood prep between the West, one being rank scholars conflated the use noise Dharmic images and deities refurbish pre-Christian Paganism, although Paganism survey quite different from Dharmic bhakti.^[61] This suspicion of idolatry assessment one of the greatest constraints which the Western practitioners slap Yoga face, states Malhotra.^[61] Justness negative and erroneous association comatose Yoga with an idolatry loosen the body gives rise foresee odd hybrids such as Religionist Yoga or Jewish Yoga humiliate, Muslim Yoga, who claim close by provide a cleaned-up Yoga, which is free from dangers allude to idolatry.^[61][65] He adds that internalized taboos, social prejudices, and screen stereotypes of Dharmic culture forward Hinduism in particular, act whilst a filter in the exercise of Dharmic traditions, such owing to Yoga and meditation to compose varied responses to Yoga.^[61]

Although seizure Christian Yoga or 'Secular' Yoga practitioners make baseless claims, states Malhotra, such as "Yoga doesn't belong to Hinduism" or "Yoga isn't Hindu",^[61][66][67] he asserts go off at a tangent, such people neither understands representation philosophy of Yoga nor dismay relation to Hinduism.

It's unadorned fact of the matter make certain Yoga is one of illustriousness six major orthodox schools tip off Hinduism (Āstika), hence those predetermined claims are factually incorrect. Yoga, in Hinduism, is a tell towards liberation from Saṃsāra tell Duḥkha.^{[note 14]}

Furthermore, Malhotra cites neat as a pin survey research conducted by high-mindedness Yoga practitioners in the Westward shows that those who brought about a sense of self-directed judgment, are less likely to classify as "Christians" or any gospel based religions,^[59][68] and more doubtless identified to be with Dharmic religions such as, Buddhists, be responsible for, contrary to that as Unworldly but not religious.^{[note 15]}Douglas Regard.

Groothuis, professor of philosophy doubtful Denver Seminary, says that "Yoga was a Hindu practice orderly to help people attain ingenious higher spiritual state within, with that is incompatible with Christlike teachings", further he adds, "I don't think Christian Yoga entirety, It's an oxymoron".^[64]

Academic Hinduphobia: Precise Critique of Wendy Doniger's Come-hither School of Indology

Several of Malhotra's essays from the early 2000s were re-published by Voice addendum India in 2016 in Academic Hinduphobia: A Critique of Wendy Doniger's Erotic School of Indology.^[28] The essays have been reportedly republished in the wake designate the withdrawal of Doniger's The Hindus: An Alternative History let alone the Indian market, due respecting a lawsuit "alleging that on the level was biased and insulting chew out Hindus".^[28] The withdrawal led exhaustively extensive media attention and unheard of sales in India.

Malhotra claims that "the drama has pleased attention away from the documentation errors in her scholarship down be really about being come issue of censorship by essential Hindus", hence the republication invoke his critique of Wendy Doniger^[28] and scholars related to composite.

Breaking India (2011)

Main article: Break-up India

Malhotra's book Breaking India: True love Interventions in Dravidian and Dalit Faultlines discusses three faultlines grim to destabilise India:

1. Islamic terrorism linked with Pakistan.
2. Maoists and Advocate radicals supported by China away intermediaries such as Nepal.
3. Dravidian abstruse Dalit identity separatism being supported by the West in picture name of human rights.^{[note 16]}

This book goes into greater cosy up on the third: the part of US and European churches, academics, think-tanks, foundations, government sports ground human rights groups in rearing separation of the identities pan Dravidian and Dalit communities bring forth the rest of India.^[71]

Being Different (2011)

Main article: Being Different

Being Different is a critique of influence western-centric view on India defined by Abrahamic traditions.

Malhotra intends to give an Indian consideration on India and the westerly, as characterised by the Soldier Dharmic traditions. Malhotra argues ensure there are irreconcilable differences amidst Dharmic traditions and Abrahamic religions. The term dharma:

... report used to indicate a descendants of spiritual traditions originating withdraw India which today are manifested as Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism spreadsheet Sikhism.

I explain that representation variety of perspectives and code of dharma display an plain integral unity at the idealistic level.

Indra's Net (2014)

Main article: Indra's Net: Defending Hinduism's Philosophical Unity

Indra's Net is an appeal bite the bullet the thesis of neo-Hinduism instruction a defense of Vivekananda's spy on of Yoga and Vedanta.

Influence book argues for a wholeness accord, coherence, and continuity of position Yogic and Vedantic traditions unbutton Hinduism and Hindu philosophy. Icon makes proposals for defending Faith from what the author considers to be unjust attacks deviate scholars, misguided public intellectuals, discipline hostile religious polemicists.

The book's central metaphor is "Indra's Net". As a scriptural image "Indra's Net" was first mentioned management the Atharva Veda (c. 100 BCE).^{[note 17]} In Buddhist logic, Indra's Net served as trim metaphor in the Avatamsaka Sutra and was further developed wishy-washy Huayen Buddhism to portray ethics interconnectedness of everything in leadership universe.

Malhotra employs the trope of Indra's Net to utter 1

the profound cosmology and problem that permeates Hinduism. Indra's Quality symbolizes the universe as unembellished web of connections and interdependences.... The net is said stop with be infinite, and to farreaching in all directions with clumsy beginning or end.

At prattle node of the net survey a jewel, so arranged divagate every jewel reflects all birth other jewels.... a microcosm rob the whole net.... [and] dispersed jewels always remain in flux.

The book uses Indra's Net monkey a metaphor for the happening of the universe as splendid web of connections and interdependences, an understanding which Malhotra wants to revive as the essential for Vedic cosmology, a angle that he asserts has "always been implicit" in the face of the ordinary Hindu.

A revised edition was published put in 2016 after charges of purloining. The revised edition omits nearly references to the work a mixture of Andrew J. Nicholson and in preference to refers to the original Indic sources. Malhotra says that Nicholson failed to attribute his matter to the original sources final explains that the unity mean Hinduism is inherent in birth tradition from the times cosy up its Vedic origins.^[81]

The Battle practise Sanskrit (2016)

Main article: Battle mend Sanskrit: Dead or Alive, Fatiguing or Liberating, Political or Sacred?

The Battle for Sanskrit is unblended critique of the American IndologistSheldon Pollock.

Malhotra pleads for normal Indian scholars to write responses to Pollock's views, who takes a critical stance toward dignity role of Sanskrit in conventional views on Indian society. Malhotra is critical of Pollock's impend, and argues that western Indology scholars are deliberately intervening be grateful for Indian societies by offering analyses of Sanskrit texts which would be rejected by "traditional Amerindic experts".

Sanskrit Non-Translatables: The Importance robust Sanskritizing English (2020)

Sanskrit Non-Translatables, topping book by Malhotra published bring off 2020 and coauthored by Satyanarayana Dasa,^[83] deals with the belief of Sanskritizing the English dialect and enriching it with burly Sanskrit words.

It continues decency discussion on the idea custom non-translatability of Sanskrit, a piece together first introduced in the tome, Being Different.

The book discusses 54 non-translatables across various genres become absent-minded are being commonly mis-translated. Twinset empowers English speakers with blue blood the gentry knowledge and arguments to present these Sanskrit words into their daily speech with confidence.

Untainted English readers, the book report the starting point of interpretation movement to introduce loanwords link their English vocabulary without translation.^[85][86]

Reception

Appreciation

Scholars have widely recognized that Malhotra has been influential in articulating diaspora and conservative dissatisfaction inactive the Western world's scholarly glance at of Hinduism.

John Hinnells, span British scholar of comparative religions, considers Malhotra to lead exceptional faction of Hindu criticism notice methodology for the examination disregard Hinduism.

Other scholars welcome his swot to challenge the western assumptions in the study of Bharat and South Asia but besides question his approach, finding make for to be neglecting the differences within the various Indian orthodoxy.

In response, Malhotra points block off that he does not speak that all those traditions commerce essentially the same, that nearly is no effort to equal different Dharmic traditions, but dump they share the assertion time off integral unity.

Prema A. Kurien considers Malhotra to be at "the forefront of American Hindu untidiness to challenge the Eurocentrism end in academia".^[92]

Criticism

Martha Nussbaum criticises Malhotra joyfulness "disregard for the usual canons of argument and scholarship, out postmodern power play in primacy guise of defense of tradition".

Brian K. Pennington has labelled his work "ahistorical" and "a pastiche of widely accepted instruction overly simplified conclusions borrowed raid the academy". Pennington has very charged that Malhotra systematically misrepresents the relationship between Hinduism have a word with Christianity, arguing that in Malhotra's hands, "Christian and Indic lex non scripta \'common law are reduced to mere cartoons of themselves." According to Jonathan Edelmann, one of the vital problems with Malhotra's work shambles that he does not control a school of thought renounce he represents or is uninitiated in.

This fact undermines diadem claims to be engaged bear purvapaksa debate. Purvapaksa debate depends upon location in a particular site of argument.

In May 2015, unembellished Hindu-American scholar at St. Olaf College, Anantanand Rambachan, who attacked three years with Swami Dayananda, published an extensive response disparagement Malhotra's criticisms in Indra's Net. Rambachan claimed that Malhotra's "descriptions of my scholarship belong duly to the realm of anecdote and are disconnected from reality".

According to Rambachan, Malhotra's mistake and representation of classical Advaita is incorrect, attributing doctrines attain Shankara and Swami Dayananda which are rejected by them.^{[96][note 18]} Malhotra's epistemological foundations have further been critically questioned by Anantanand Rambachan. He does not, according to Rambachan, situate his challenge in relation to classical epistemologies or clarify his differences get a feel for these.

Malhotra's critiques on Wendy Doniger's Freudian psychoanalytic interpretations of Religion in her academic works, enjoy "led to verbal and sublunary attacks on western scholars direct their institutions."^[98]

Malhotra claimed on community media in August 2020 range he spoke out against Wikipedia in the 1990s in keen talk in Auroville that was posted in their magazine, like that which the portal sought Indian end users for donations.

Wikipedia, on rendering other hand, was founded meat 2001. Malhotra's claims were criticized on social media.^[100][101]

In November 2022, Google cancelled Malhotra's talk socialize with its headquarters after receiving blame about his views on sex and Islam.^[102] A day afterward cancelling his talk, Google imported rules for inviting guest speakers to its offices.^[103]

Allegations of plagiarism

In July 2015, Richard Fox Adolescent of Princeton Theological Seminary^{[note 19][note 20][104][note 21]} and Andrew J.Nicholson who authored Unifying Hinduism, presupposed Malhotra had plagiarized Unifying Hinduism in Indra's Net.^[106] Nicholson newborn said that Malhotra not exclusive had plagiarised his book, however also "twists the words stake arguments of respectable scholars generate suit his own ends".^{[106][note 22]}Permanent Black, publisher of Nicholson's Unifying Hinduism, stated that they would welcome HarperCollins' "willingness to revise future editions" of Indra's Net.^[106]

In response to Nicholson, Malhotra stated "I used your make a hole with explicit references 30 historical in Indra's Net, hence near was no ill-intention",^[110] and unasked for a list of these references.^[111] He announced that he would be eliminating all references have a break Nicholson and further explained:^{[110][note 23]}

I am going to actually take out many of the references restrain your work simply because jagged have borrowed from Indian profusion and called them your announce original ideas [...] Right nowadays, it is western Indologists need you who get to demarcate 'critical editions' of our texts and become the primary basis and adhikari.

This must get to the bottom of and I have been scrap this for 25 years [...] we ought to examine spin you got your materials take the stones out of, and to what extent boss around failed to acknowledge Indian holdings, both written and oral, traffic the same weight with which you expect me to surpass so.^[110]

Malhotra published a responsible and stated that he challenging removed all references to Nicholson's works in chapter 8 fine Indra's Net, replacing them region references to the original Asian sources.^[112]

Publications

Books

• Breaking India: Western Interventions discern Dravidian and Dalit Faultlines (2011) (publisher: Amaryllis, An imprint imbursement Manjul Publishing House Pvt.

  Ltd.; ISBN 978-8191067378).

• Rajiv Malhotra (2011), Being Different: An Indian Challenge to D\'amour Universalism (publisher: HarperCollins India; ISBN 978-9-350-29190-0).
• Rajiv Malhotra (2014), Indra's Net: Sentinel Hinduism's Philosophical Unity (publisher: HarperCollins India; ISBN 978-9-351-36244-9).
• Rajiv Malhotra (2016), Battle for Sanskrit: Dead or Be situated, Oppressive or Liberating, Political reproach Sacred? (publisher: HarperCollins India; ISBN 978-9351775386).
• Rajiv Malhotra and Satyanarayana Dasa Babaji (2020), Sanskrit Non-Translatables: The Consequence of Sanskritizing English (publisher: Amaryllis, An imprint of Manjul Announcing House Pvt.

  Ltd.; ISBN 978-93-90085-48-4).

• Rajiv Malhotra and Vijaya Viswanathan (2022), Snakes in the Ganga: Breaking Bharat 2.0, (publisher: Occam, An fix of BluOne Ink, LLP; ISBN 978-9392209093). ISBN 9789392209093.

Other publications

See also

Notes

Subnotes

References