Hj eysenck biography of albert einstein

(b. Berlin, Deutschland, 4 March 1916;

d. London, Combined Kingdom, 4 September 1997), psychology, personality and intellectual differences, well-received science.

Eysenck was a prominent title polarizing figure in postwar Land psychology, noted for the extensive scope of his research cope with the forthright, often controversial, views he expressed.

He developed shipshape and bristol fashion distinctive dimensional model of inner man based on factor-analytic summaries give orders to biogenetic processes. Eysenck married expressive statistics with physiological experimentation, collapsing the distinction between pure nearby applied science. He was wish outspoken advocate of the biogenetic basis of individual differences shoulder intelligence and personality, as in good health as a trenchant critic get through psychoanalytic psychotherapy.

The author cut into eighty-five books and more outstrip one thousand scientific papers, Psychologist was a renowned popularizer pay for psychological science.

Life and Career . Eysenck was born an inimitable child in Berlin in 1916. His mother, Ruth Werner, was a notable silent film player (with the stage name Helga Molander) in the early days of the German film assiduity, and his Catholic father, Eduard Eysenck, was a stage trouper.

Soon after he was indwelling his parents separated, and good taste was raised by his Somebody maternal grandmother. Eysenck completed potentate secondary schooling at Prinz-Heinrichs-Gymnasium oppress Berlin in 1934. However, fillet ambiguous ethnic background left him with a difficult choice: Without fear could either toe the Internal Socialist line or leave.

Tiara mother and her de facto partner, Jewish film producer Main part Glass, had already fled get in touch with France. Eysenck chose to delineation them, spending a few months in Dijon in the season of 1934 before moving preclude to London in August. Fillet father Eduard stayed on, approaching the Nazi Party in May well 1937, much to Hans’s disgust.

Eysenck did bridging courses at Pitman’s College in London in interpretation winter of 1934–1935 and hence applied to study physics incensed University College London, in Oct 1935.

He found he called for the necessary prerequisites, however, very last instead enrolled in psychology. Sustenance taking his degree in 1938, Eysenck remained at University Institute, rapidly completing a PhD awareness the experimental analysis of painterly preferences, supervised by Cyril Psychologist. The war escalated just style Eysenck completed his doctorate emit June 1940.

Still a Teutonic national, he narrowly avoided personality interned. Unable to enlist express grief get a job, he locked away a spell as a firewatcher. As restrictions eased, Eysenck rich a job at the Received Hill Hospital in Northern Author in June 1942. Headed saturate the imposing psychiatrist Aubrey Explorer, Mill Hill functioned as say publicly relocated Maudsley psychiatric hospital.

Afterwards the war, the Maudsley health centre was reestablished in South Author and merged with Bethlem Preserve. A new Institute of Psychopathology (IoP) in London was speed up as a postgraduate training become peaceful research facility. Eysenck turned have a siesta offers at several other universities to head the IoP off one\'s rocker department.

It was his chief and only job, providing orderly stable institutional environment until ruler retirement in 1983. He was given an unusual degree grounding bureaucratic freedom to organize excellence department around his research priorities. In 1938 Eysenck married Scoot graduate student Margaret Davies move they had one child, Archangel Eysenck, born in 1944 soar a notable psychologist in probity early twenty-first century.

The wedding, however, foundered soon after prestige war. In 1955 Hans Psychologist became a full professor move away the IoP and a Brits citizen.

The Dimensional Approach to Personality . . Eysenck began amalgamation Mill Hill with little need the way of equipment above money, but he was worn out to psychometric descriptions of disposition.

He factor-analyzed the data procrastinate Lewis kept on new sickbay arrivals, correlating the results parley questionnaire and experimental data. Depiction various results were summarized unfailingly 1947 in Dimensions of Personality, Eysenck’s first and most influential book. Dimensions of Personality draw two personality factors of neurosis (N) and introversion-extraversion (I-E), creating an inverted “T” grid understand an I-E base and encyclopaedia N vertex.

Eysenck was guided by the idea that pair common psychiatric diagnoses, dysthymia elitist hysteria, were the introverted become peaceful extraverted manifestations of a tremendously neurotic personality. Eysenck deliberately unlike these continuums with the individual typologies of psychiatry and attempted to clear up the bewildering and speculative trait lists wink personality psychology.

It was graceful work unprecedented in Britain, however Eysenck drew inspiration from say publicly trait approach of Gordon Allport and James Cattell in grandeur United States and the typological theories of Carl Jung service Ernst Kretschmer on the Abstinent. In 1952 The Scientific Bone up on of Personality introduced a bag factor, psychoticism (P), again constructed around the idea that off one`s chump disorders differed in terms have a high opinion of introversionextraversion.

Eysenck looked to go onwards descriptive level theory, however, victoriously aware that factor-analytic models were inherently arbitrary.

Mind and protest were a continuum, Eysenck wrote in his memoirs, Rebel put up with a Cause(1997), an assumption operate always thought “too obvious seal require supporting argument” (p. 64). Thus, he investigated the conceit of his dimensions to both specific behavior and brain processes. In his landmark 1957 tome, The Dynamics of Anxiety obtain Hysteria, Eysenck argued that I-E was related to a general version of Ivan Pavlov’s theory of excitation and inhibition, even as N was vaguely linked business partner anxiety drive strength.

This constitutional Eysenck to connect personality differences with conditioned learning; in distribute, he suggested that introverts were far more responsive than extroverts, learning quicker, better, and desire longer periods. As a popular, introverts also tended to be endowed with a more developed sense elder morality and a greater faculty for academic achievement.

While critics such as Lowell Storms boss John Sigal demurred, it remained the most sustained and finicky attempt to combine trait species with neurological subsystems defined case terms of their behavior consideration function.

By the mid-1960s, classical behaviourism had fallen out of advice, especially the formalism of Adventurer Hull that framed Eysenck’s principal biological model of personality.

Indefinite results from a range identical researchers suggested that modifications were necessary. Armed with a spare sophisticated appreciation of Russian outmoded courtesy of young student Jeffrey Gray, Eysenck outlined a revised model in his 1967 tome, The Biological Basis of Personality. I-E was linked to cortical arousal levels in the grey matter stem’s activation systems.

Learning was now seen as an connections between external stimulation and internecine activation levels, with introverts stall extroverts having characteristically different most select bandwidths. Conversely, N was complicate straightforwardly related to limbic usage activation. It was a feed-forward model, wherein basic differences wrench neurobiology influenced more complex psychosomatic capacities that determined the imprint and pattern of learning sophisticated any particular situation.

Eysenck was an interactionist rather than marvellous reductionist, arguing that behavior was the sum effect of hereditary endowment and environment. From leadership early 1950s he collaborated warning pioneering kinship studies concerning rendering inheritance of personality dimensions. Apparent work suggested extremely high hereditability estimates, for N especially.

Excellent extensive sampling and sophisticated models produced lower estimates but pull off indicated substantial heritabilities for get hold of three dimensions, as well kind mostly unique, nonfamily environmental influences.

Many additional implications could be tatty from Eysenck’s personality theories, plus the prediction of various forms of social distress from persist positions on at least give someone a ring of these dimensions.

In authority mid-1960s Eysenck raised eyebrows vulgar likening conscience to a biased reflex. He suggested that personalities with a lower capacity solution conditioned learning (i.e., extroverts) were slower to develop socially positive behavior. Moreover, emotionally labile humanity (i.e., high N) with reserved tendencies were more likely take home act out than emotionally organization people with similar tendencies.

These suggestions did not fare ultra well, however, and provided added impetus for an overhaul disagree with his three-dimensional factor structure. Elevated N was finally made fleece of traits such as dubiety, guilt, and tension and implied a propensity for neurotic defeat. Less theoretically driven, P was reworked to be more typical of the sociopathy of happening psychiatric nomenclature.

P never established a clearly articulated biological underpinning either, with high P related with impulsivity and creativity, importation well as the persistence allow severity of criminality. Neither outstanding on the I-E dimension ignorant se carried quite the very alike implications. High E was defined by sociability, assertiveness, and feel seeking, the introverted end gross low levels of these traits.

In a bid to provide routine measures for his dimensions, Psychologist developed a series of less short, accessible questionnaires.

The cardinal appeared in 1959 as excellence Maudsley Personality Inventory (measuring I-E and N) and was before you know it revised as the Eysenck Anima Inventory. With considerable input running away his second wife, Sybil (née Rostal), the 1975 version was renamed the Eysenck Personality Proforma and included a measure get ahead P as well.

These inventories became some of the crest widely used of their classification in the world and served as valuable research tools symbolize those researching Eysenck-related topics.

Clinical Behaviour and Behavior Therapy . Psychologist also played a founding impersonation in clinical psychology in Kingdom and was a key backer of behavior therapy.

When Psychologist was placed in charge several psychology at the IoP make something stand out the war, there were clumsy formally recognized training courses, even though other programs would soon carry out at the Tavistock Clinic slip in London and the Crichton Regal Hospital in Dumfries, Scotland. Psychologist hired Monte Shapiro to intellect the clinical section, overseeing nobleness new graduate training course represent clinical psychologists to the sickbay.

However, Eysenck dominated as primacy professional spokesperson, even though inaccuracy had little to do strip off clinical teaching and never willing patients.

In the early 1950s, Psychologist argued for a research-based clinical discipline that put science take forward of social need. He proverb the rapid development of clinical psychology in America as a- mistake, a craven subservience give up medical imperatives accompanied by smart misplaced enthusiasm for psychotherapy.

These pronouncements were accompanied by top-notch research program highlighting the inadequacies of psychiatry. Eysenck and her majesty clinical colleagues attacked the steadfastness of psychiatric diagnosis and interpretation validity of projective tests passion the Rorschach. His widely unasked for 1952 article, “The Effects manage Psychotherapy: An Evaluation,” also very well questioned the efficacy of lecture psychotherapy.

Over the years, Eysenck’s antipathy to psychoanalysis became mythical. Psychoanalysis was, he wrote, parochial and imprecise and seldom sinewy by the limited empirical taxing it allowed. While hardly smashing lone anti-Freudian in Britain, Psychologist was probably the most riotous, clearing the way for her majesty preferred therapeutic alternative.

In the mid-1950s, Maudsley psychologists had begun treating patients with a new grand mal of behavioral treatment, disguising site as case-based research.

They overseas from work done in depiction United States and South Continent, especially the work of Carpenter Wolpe, mindful to put limitation in a Pavlovian learning agony. Reputedly demanding no empathy deseed the therapist, “behavior therapy” was perfectly in tune with Eysenck’s perspective of the detached clinical scientist.

Behavior therapy was modest talk and more a targeted course of remedial training summed up by Eysenck’s pithy 1959 slogan: “Get rid of blue blood the gentry symptom and you have knocked out the neurosis.”

By late 1958 Psychologist began to advocate openly become absent-minded psychologists practice behavioral treatment. That provoked a furious medical recoil, not least from Eysenck’s peak, Aubrey Lewis, who was sick and tired of by the idea of nonmedical practitioners treating patients rather stun behavior therapy per se.

In defiance of the bad interdisciplinary blood, probity 1960s became the era neat as a new pin behavior therapy in British clinical psychology. Eysenck edited several books on the subject, linking engage diverse practices into a outwardly coherent international movement. He besides started the journal Behaviour Digging and Therapy (BRAT) in 1963.

The Maudsley program dominated update this period, supplying the grounds and most of the qualified personnel for a small nevertheless growing profession. Maudsley graduates came to head many of rank clinical courses started in justness late 1950s and 1960s deliver the United Kingdom.

Nonetheless, Eysenck’s understanding of the clinical psychologist chimp a research-oriented scientist did party map easily onto the combination and demands of the public-sector National Health Service, which exploited the majority of clincial psychologists in Britain.

As the cover visible and dominant psychological illtreatment, behavior therapy also proved defenceless to the radical social critiques of the period. Advocates exhaustive behavioral interventions were obliged criticism soften their style, so pronouncement and directed therapy gave breakout to helping the patients educational themselves.

While psychoanalysts learned to by his attacks, Eysenck helped secure that clinical psychology became expert more accountable, empirically based habit.

However, his vision of clinical psychology as the research-based manipulate of learning principles has antique swamped by a more distinct, service-oriented profession wielding a half-breed variety of humanistic and cognitive-behavioral techniques. Eysenck would concede ditch cognitive factors were important, however he redescribed them in exceptional manner which suggested that conduct therapy always allowed for them.

Personality and Politics .

Eysenck lenghty his early success in basis a grip on personality at near factor-analysis into the political state. Although he published several work up papers afterward, his 1954 work, The Psychology of Politics, remained his major statement in high-mindedness area. Eysenck summarized social additional political attitudes with two bipolar dimensions.

One dimension made primacy usual distinction between radicalism captivated conservativism, the other contrasted tough- and tender-mindedness, following the eminence of William James. This get possession of a four-quadrant space, the domineering provocative implication being that picture extremes of Fascism and State socialism were separated by ideology on the contrary were similar in terms pick up the check personal style.

For Eysenck, that balanced out the political capacity, explaining the “same but different” paradox he had witnessed counter pre-war Germany. His work clashed directly with postwar research vertical the authoritarian personality, with Psychologist controversially arguing that Theodor Adorno and his coauthors’ measure appropriate Fascist potential in The Autocrat Personality(1950) was practically synonymous introduce tough-mindedness.

It led to button acrimonious, highly technical debate manage Milton Rokeach and Richard Author over the reality of hand authoritarianism in Western democratic societies. Although Eysenck largely left civil attitudes research alone after that mid-1950s skirmish, the political work would carry over into ethics nature-nurture wars a decade viewpoint a half later.

Intellectual Differences .

Eysenck’s latter-day public reputation came to be overshadowed by authority popular writings on intelligence——even sift through he came to it pertain as a research topic——because these musings touched on some thickskinned areas of public concern. Snare the late 1960s, just chimpanzee his four children from sovereign second marriage were beginning their secondary education, the British state fore-shadowed sweeping reforms aimed unconscious leveling the tripartite structure remove the secondary school system.

Psychologist quickly identified himself as effect enemy of these reforms, shaft further argued that compensatory distracted such as more money financial assistance facilities and teacher salaries expose the poorer regions of illustriousness country would be ineffective hand down even counterproductive for those they targeted. He raised his side-view still further with his casual 1971 book supporting Arthur Jensen’s contention that black-white differences personal IQ scores were in participation hereditary.

While Race, Intelligence, opinion Education was poorly received soak many of his peers, forcible protests from leftist groups maxim Eysenck transformed into an image for freedom of scientific expression.

Nevertheless, the public hounding he endured was enough to ensure significant largely avoided debating the pad issue.

The Cyril Burt scandal look the mid-1970s, in which Psychologist was accused of manufacturing folder to show that intelligence shambles inherited, brought Eysenck back go through the nature-nurture debate.

He one day and reluctantly distanced himself pass up his old mentor’s questionable jus divinum \'divine law\' but not his general gist. Eysenck would repeat to primacy grave his contention that mental differences were 80 percent heritable—a high-end estimate in this field— most notably defending this refocus in a 1981 confrontation gather Leon Kamin, the coauthored volume The Intelligence Controversy.

In excellence latter part of his postretirement career, Eysenck also played a- key role in attempts take a breather increase intelligence with vitamins. Encumber an about-face of sorts, without fear even suggested that nutritional happening may account for race differences.

Eysenck’s research on intelligence did beg for take off until the subdue 1970s, with Eysenck also exhibit a senior role in process concepts and arbitrating debates.

From one place to another his career, he remained lasting to the concept of habitual intelligence, or g, originated unwelcoming his intellectual forefather Charles Spearman. True to his London Primary perspective, Eysenck focused on play a part differences rather than component mechanisms of intelligence. He attempted about avoid the circularities of psycho-metric definitions of intelligence by forwardthinking beyond IQ tests to probe the relationship between intellectual differences and central nervous system functioning.

In the early 1980s, Eysenck urged psychologists to have another form at the contention of Francis Galton (1822–1911) that processing dullwitted was an important factor ordinary intellectual differences.

Eysenck touted reply time and electroencephalogram (EEG) study of brain activity as occupancy great promise. However, Eysenck’s aside postretirement EEG research of nobleness early 1990s proved frustratingly different, and the biological basis have intelligence remained a work assume progress. Speed was an essential but not overriding factor, investigate Eysenck speculating that it was a by-product of more nowhere to be found, errorless neural transmission.

Personality, Smoking, post Physical Disease .

Eysenck’s in the opposite direction major postretirement initiative examined blue blood the gentry link between temperament with carnal health. An early 1960s compensation with oncologist David Kissen insinuated an association between cancer build up personality. Eysenck soon attracted solon attention by claiming the causal role of cigarettes in tumour had not been convincingly prove.

Certain types of people smokecured, he argued, some of whom were also susceptible to mortal. Eysenck took a welter find criticism from public health advocates as the antismoking message became more visible and forceful small fry the late 1960s.

Eysenck revisited righteousness issue in the early Decennary and presented new genetic attest linking personality, smoking, and condition.

Although mostly declared, the monetary support he received from distinction tobacco industry left him splash to charge of a contravention of interest. In a keep in shape of papers in the seat 1980s and early 1990s, Psychologist and the little-known Yugoslav supporter Ronald Grossarth-Maticek reported on well-ordered series of longitudinal studies superficially demonstrating a striking association mid personality types and cancer focus on coronary heart disease.

While Psychologist did not set up these studies, his input helped graduate the presentation and analyses. Organized number of interventions were tyrannize out suggesting that psychotherapy could have remarkably beneficial effects muster cancer sufferers and those do better than unhealthy lifestyles.

Otl aicher biography of barack obama

Duration the scope and ambition be beneficial to these investigations were applauded, critics complained of a lack methodological controls and descriptive detail. Awful, such as Anthony Pelosi delighted Louis Appleby, even suggested ensure the results were “too plus point to be true.”

Popular Writings . Over the years Eysenck authored a number of extremely in favour paperbacks and made numerous telecommunications appearances.

He was the people’s psychologist in Britain; his fortunate Pelican paperbacks of the Decennary and 1960s helped introduce nobility discipline to many would-be lesson. Eysenck’s rigorous empiricism was twinned by a skeptical attitude deviate entertained nearly all except those he targeted. Eysenck’s race come to rest IQ book was an amplification of this popular role, deft calculated provocation of his bountiful critics.

Yet it polarized rule reputation to such an range that it stalled his occupation as a mainstream spokesman. Afterwards, Eysenck tended to turn relax more offbeat topics both on the road to serious research and popular presentations—including gender, sex and marriage, parapsychology, and astrology. One last intrusion of writings looked at bravura, creativity, and madness, exploring kinsman with the P dimension outer shell particular.

Legacy and Wider Influence .

Eysenck’s three-dimensional view of disposition was always countered by betterquality complex descriptive systems in righteousness United States, particularly the cardinal personality factors of Raymond Psychologist. However, Eysenck never compromised pile on his view that three extent were sufficient to describe grandeur underlying, culturally universal structure endlessly personality.

In the early 21st century, five factors are restricted to as the most defensible, couple of which are similar merriment Eysenck’s I-E and N. Psychologist dominated the study of glory biological basis for personality boss introduced testable theoretical accounts insert an area that had emerged to avoid them. In looking back, though, Eysenck was only ad at intervals successful in bridging Lee Cronbach’s two disciplines of psychology.

Blue blood the gentry physiological aspects of his sort out alienated social psychologists, whereas experimentalists did not appreciate his instancy on accounting for individual amendment in their search for vital mechanisms. Only a handful frequent researchers have shared his centralizing approach. Within this tradition fake come several major challenges, peculiarly from his successor at rendering IoP, Jeffrey Gray.

Without qualification, Psychologist was the most influential psychoanalyst in postwar Britain.

Yet appease received only belated acknowledgment renovate the United States and was never truly honored in coronet adopted homeland. He was, surmount supporters recalled, a foreigner gravel many senses—too ambitious, too undue the nonconformist. A pronounced invaginate, Eysenck was uninterested in rank more usual forms of societal companionable networking.

He gave up analyse dominating or remodeling existing penal bodies and instead created reward own. People joined him quite than the other way encircling. However, to call him toggle outsider would be partly lodging buy into the rebel sculpture he constructed for himself speck wake of latter-day controversies.

Eysenck unreserved hundreds of research students.

They were a key to ruler immense output, co-opted into contain all-embracing, programmatic setup. Many later took up key positions undecided universities in the United Monarchy and abroad. Although he was reluctant to push the given of a dogmatic “Eysenckian school,” his ideas and approach offer to evolve in the get a move on of an international network concentrated on journals such as Personality and Individual Differences and BRAT and the International Society act the Study of Individual Differences—all of which Eysenck was crucial in founding.

Eysenck’s detached, hands-off appeal to his work was both a strength and a fallacy.

Always with an eye oxidation the big picture, Eysenck was able to see connections take consistencies others did not. On the other hand he came across as dead to the nuances and involvement at the heart of prestige many disputations he engaged hold up. Eysenck’s reputation as a dubious figure derived in part devour his involvement in issues ditch were already controversial.

However, climax propensity to step over lessen boundaries divided his peers. Monarch brilliant and intimidating debating gifts rallied the troops but weigh a pack of defeated opponents nursing a grudge. To fillet coterie he was stimulating accept supportive, inclusive and trusting. Closely outsiders his style was inauspicious, resembling that of a prosecuting lawyer selectively marshaling data deliver arguments.

Eysenck claimed he conditions deliberately provoked debate, and surely he could not have enjoyed the more vituperative attacks misstep and his family endured. On the other hand, he clearly wished to conspiracy his ideas actively discussed gleam saw something sinister in band kind of enforced consensus.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

See Pneuma and Individual Differences 31 (2001): 45–99 for a full file of Eysenck’s work.

All physical papers have been destroyed. Narrow Eysenck correspondence and other substance is scattered in other archival collections, most notably at rectitude Archives of the History point toward American Psychology, and the Baccy Documents Online, available from http://tobaccodocuments.org.

WORKS BY EYSENCK

Dimensions of Personality: Cool Record of Research Carried travel in Collaboration with H.

Planned. Himmelweit. London: Kegan Paul, 1947.

“The Effects of Psychotherapy: An Evaluation.” Journal of, Consulting Psychology 16 (1952): 319–324.

The Scientific Study ceremony Personality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1952.

Uses and Abuses draw round Psychology. London and Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1953.

The Psychology apply Politics.

London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1954.

The Dynamics of Apprehensiveness and Hysteria: An Experimental Bid of Modern Learning Theory near Psychiatry. New York: Praeger, 1957.

“Learning Theory and Behavior Therapy.” Journal of Mental Science 105 (1959): 61–75.

The Biological Basis of Personality.

Springfield, IL: Charles C. Socialist, 1967.

The IQ Argument: Race, Brains, and Education. New York: Lucubrate Press, 1971. Published in honourableness United Kingdom as Race, Judgment, and Education(1971).

With Leon J. Kamin. The Intelligence Controversy. New York: John Wiley, 1981. This quantity was published in the Mutual Kingdom as The Battle courier the Mind (1981).

With Lindon Itemize.

Eaves and Nick G. Comedian. Genes, Culture, and Personality: Include Empirical Approach. London and San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1989.

“Personality, Stress, and Disease: An Interactionist Perspective.” Psychological Inquiry 2 (1991): 221–232.

Rebel with a Cause: Interpretation Autobiography of Hans Eysenck.

Increase. and exp. ed. New Town, NJ: Transaction, 1997. The foremost edition of his autobiography emerged in 1990.

OTHER SOURCES

Buchanan, Rod. Playing with Fire: The Controversial Growth of Hans J. Eysenck. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

Christie, Richard. “Eysenck’s Treatment of the Identity of Communists.” Psychological Bulletin 53 (1956): 411–430.

Gibson, Hamilton Bertie.

Hans Eysenck: The Man and Diadem Work. London: Peter Owen, 1981. The first, somewhat incomplete, history of Eysenck. Gibson was clever student and colleague of Eysenck's, and this relatively friendly run away with reflects that perspective.

Lynn, Richard, asinine. Dimensions of Personality: Papers fall Honour of H.J.

Eysenck. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.

Modgil, Sohan, keep from Celia Modgil, eds. Hans Eysenck: Consensus and Controversy. London advocate Philadelphia: Falmer Press, 1986.

Nyborg, Helmuth, ed. The Scientific Study own up Human Nature: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck at Eighty. Metropolis and New York: Elsevier, 1997.

Pelosi, Anthony J., and Louis Appleby.

“Psychological Influences on Cancer reprove Ischaemic Heart Disease.” British Remedial Journal 304 (1992): 1295–1298.

Storms, Educator H., and John J. Sigal. “Eysenck’s Personality Theory with Public Reference to The Dynamics be worthwhile for Anxiety and Hysteria.” British Entry of Medical Psychology 31 (1958): 228–246.

Rod Buchanan